Xander Used Poetry, Existential Curiosity, and a Leap of Faith to Earn Admission into UChicago
Xander
180 students read this
15 min
acceptances
The story
Xanderâs case study offers a bold example of how creative risk-taking, literary voice, and deep self-reflection can redefine what a college application looks like. His journeyâfrom scrapping months of drafts to submitting sonnetsâshows how staying true to your intellectual instincts can set you apart at even the most competitive schools. Readers will gain insight into aligning with institutional values, crafting a memorable narrative, and embracing their quirks unapologetically. Itâs a must-read for anyone wondering how to turn passion into persuasion.
The essays
The Process
Xander Hastings scrapped months of essay drafts one week before the deadline. What replaced them wasnât a rewritten paragraphâit was an act of reinvention. In a moment of bold surrender to his instincts, he rewrote his University of Chicago supplement in Spenserian sonnets, in iambic pentameter, turning the essay prompt into both subject and structure. In doing so, he did more than stand outâhe became unforgettable. âI was scared to scrap so many months of progress,â Xander said. âBut as I began coming up with rhymes and doing syllable scansion, I completely came alive. It was so much more me.â He wasnât afraid to be dense, elaborate, or wildly metaphorical. His only rule was clarity: as long as people could understand it, thatâs all I cared about. This wasnât an attempt to impress for its own sakeâit was a way to signal what UChicago most wants in its students: someone willing to take risks, dive deep, and lean all the way into their quirks.
Values & Fit
The University of Chicago's core mission, as expressed in its Latin motto "Crescat scientia; vita excolatur," translates to "Let knowledge grow from more and more; and so be human life enriched". Xander didnât just read that missionâhe engaged with it. He studied the schoolâs Core Curriculum, its student traditions, its interdisciplinary freedoms, and its love of the eccentric. On his campus visit, the signs werenât subtle. From spontaneous chats with professors to surreal encounters with strangers who seemed to read his thoughts, Xander recalls:
That day, the wind changed. And Xander, who had set sail toward another school entirely, found himself off-course in the best way imaginable.
Snippets We Loved
This metaphor did more than explain Xanderâs enthusiasm. It radiated it.
Rather than telling UChicago he could see himself there, Xander showed themâin vivid moments and symbolic gesturesâthat he already did.
Engagement
UChicago doesnât just seek intellectualsâit seeks participants. People who will take the schoolâs raw resources and breathe life into them. Xander saw this clearly. His passions werenât limited to the library. He imagined himself: - Studying astrophysics with the team searching for extraterrestrial life - Traveling to Hong Kong for the renowned economics abroad program - Applying his Mandarin skills and cultural interests on a global scale - Becoming one of the names whispered on future UChicago tours, like those behind the first controlled nuclear reaction He even submitted a supplemental essay prompt to admissions, still used today:
In this, and everything else, Xander wasn't just engaging with the campusâhe was building onto it.
Key Themes
UChicago isnât a place that wants simple answers. It wants students willing to wrestle with the complexity of life itself. Xander wasâand isâone of those students. Radical Authenticity â His writing wasnât safe. It was poetic, expressive, and deeply âhim.â Intellectual Vitality â He devoured ideas and reshaped them. He loved literature, but studied economics and astrophysics. He lived interdisciplinarity. Existential Drive â His essays were rooted in legacy, mortality, meaning, and myth. It wasnât just academicâit was spiritual.
đ Primary Archetype: Narrator
Xander leads with voice. His application is art, not just information. From rewriting his essays as Spenserian sonnets to crafting a metaphor-rich journey of intellectual awakening, he embodies the "main character" of his story. His writing is self-aware, expressive, layere ry, and intentionally theatrical. This is narrative-as-admissions-tool at its peak.
This is not just storytellingâthis is mythmaking.
đ Supporting Archetype: Wildcard
Who else rewrites their supplement in iambic pentameter? Xander's literary gambit is an unmistakable act of creative defianceâand it worked. From describing campus as a Pac-Man board to inventing Martian scenarios for supplemental prompts, his approach is magnetic, eccentric, and delightful. His brand of originality is uncoachable.
This is the beating heart of a Wildcard: someone who surprises, entertains, and captivates.
âš Bonus Archetype: Genuine Article
Despite the literary armor, Xanderâs vulnerability and truthfulness ring out. He scrapped months of work. He submitted something truer. He talked openly about self-doubt, reinvention, and cosmic meaning. His story isnât about performing perfectionâitâs about owning his own kind of weird, and daring to go all-in on it.
This is authenticity through intellectual risk.
Closing Notes
Q: What advice would you give prospective students?
When asked what heâd tell his younger selfâor any student unsure of their fitâXander had this to say:
Beyond Admission
Xanderâs journey didnât stop with UChicago. It became the launchpad for a new kind of legacy. After graduation, he founded Scholarly, a platform that connects applicants with real students and grads from top schools for mentorship, essay feedback, and personalized insight. Why?
Scholarly is part storytelling, part strategy, and all heartâjust like Xanderâs application.