Xander Used Poetry, Existential Curiosity, and a Leap of Faith to Earn Admission into UChicago

Xander

180 students read this

15 min

acceptances

The story

Xander’s case study offers a bold example of how creative risk-taking, literary voice, and deep self-reflection can redefine what a college application looks like. His journey—from scrapping months of drafts to submitting sonnets—shows how staying true to your intellectual instincts can set you apart at even the most competitive schools. Readers will gain insight into aligning with institutional values, crafting a memorable narrative, and embracing their quirks unapologetically. It’s a must-read for anyone wondering how to turn passion into persuasion.

The essays

The Process

Xander Hastings scrapped months of essay drafts one week before the deadline. What replaced them wasn’t a rewritten paragraph—it was an act of reinvention. In a moment of bold surrender to his instincts, he rewrote his University of Chicago supplement in Spenserian sonnets, in iambic pentameter, turning the essay prompt into both subject and structure. In doing so, he did more than stand out—he became unforgettable. “I was scared to scrap so many months of progress,” Xander said. “But as I began coming up with rhymes and doing syllable scansion, I completely came alive. It was so much more me.” He wasn’t afraid to be dense, elaborate, or wildly metaphorical. His only rule was clarity: as long as people could understand it, that’s all I cared about. This wasn’t an attempt to impress for its own sake—it was a way to signal what UChicago most wants in its students: someone willing to take risks, dive deep, and lean all the way into their quirks.

Values & Fit

The University of Chicago's core mission, as expressed in its Latin motto "Crescat scientia; vita excolatur," translates to "Let knowledge grow from more and more; and so be human life enriched". Xander didn’t just read that mission—he engaged with it. He studied the school’s Core Curriculum, its student traditions, its interdisciplinary freedoms, and its love of the eccentric. On his campus visit, the signs weren’t subtle. From spontaneous chats with professors to surreal encounters with strangers who seemed to read his thoughts, Xander recalls:

It was as if the National Philharmonic Orchestra began playing Father Kolbe’s Preaching and I was Jim Carey in the final scene of The Truman Show, with my hand pressed against a wall I never knew was there.

That day, the wind changed. And Xander, who had set sail toward another school entirely, found himself off-course in the best way imaginable.

I left campus under the impression that maybe some divine power had shown me an opportunity to better myself and to seize a chance at an exciting and intellectually stimulating life.

Snippets We Loved

The UChicago campus had become a game of Pac-Man for me, and all the white dots that I had to gobble up were irresistibly intriguing traditions, powerful resources, and intellectual stimulations to fall in love with.

This metaphor did more than explain Xander’s enthusiasm. It radiated it.

Just walking down the street, a physics professor struck up a conversation about the local political climate
 when our paths diverged, he asked me what class year I was, and I lit up like a firecracker.

Rather than telling UChicago he could see himself there, Xander showed them—in vivid moments and symbolic gestures—that he already did.

Engagement

UChicago doesn’t just seek intellectuals—it seeks participants. People who will take the school’s raw resources and breathe life into them. Xander saw this clearly. His passions weren’t limited to the library. He imagined himself: - Studying astrophysics with the team searching for extraterrestrial life - Traveling to Hong Kong for the renowned economics abroad program - Applying his Mandarin skills and cultural interests on a global scale - Becoming one of the names whispered on future UChicago tours, like those behind the first controlled nuclear reaction He even submitted a supplemental essay prompt to admissions, still used today:

You are on an expedition to found a colony on Mars, when from a nearby crater, a group of Martians suddenly emerges
 What do you share with them to show that humanity is worth their time?

In this, and everything else, Xander wasn't just engaging with the campus—he was building onto it.

Key Themes

UChicago isn’t a place that wants simple answers. It wants students willing to wrestle with the complexity of life itself. Xander was—and is—one of those students. Radical Authenticity – His writing wasn’t safe. It was poetic, expressive, and deeply “him.” Intellectual Vitality – He devoured ideas and reshaped them. He loved literature, but studied economics and astrophysics. He lived interdisciplinarity. Existential Drive – His essays were rooted in legacy, mortality, meaning, and myth. It wasn’t just academic—it was spiritual.

We are remembered by our work, our myths, our words.

📚 Primary Archetype: Narrator

Xander leads with voice. His application is art, not just information. From rewriting his essays as Spenserian sonnets to crafting a metaphor-rich journey of intellectual awakening, he embodies the "main character" of his story. His writing is self-aware, expressive, layere ry, and intentionally theatrical. This is narrative-as-admissions-tool at its peak.

It was so much more me. You live as long as your work survives. We are remembered by our work, our myths, our words.

This is not just storytelling—this is mythmaking.

🎭 Supporting Archetype: Wildcard

Who else rewrites their supplement in iambic pentameter? Xander's literary gambit is an unmistakable act of creative defiance—and it worked. From describing campus as a Pac-Man board to inventing Martian scenarios for supplemental prompts, his approach is magnetic, eccentric, and delightful. His brand of originality is uncoachable.

The best parts of my life
 were all pleasant surprises from serendipity herself.

This is the beating heart of a Wildcard: someone who surprises, entertains, and captivates.

✹ Bonus Archetype: Genuine Article

Despite the literary armor, Xander’s vulnerability and truthfulness ring out. He scrapped months of work. He submitted something truer. He talked openly about self-doubt, reinvention, and cosmic meaning. His story isn’t about performing perfection—it’s about owning his own kind of weird, and daring to go all-in on it.

Don’t be afraid to go over the top—embrace the weird within you. The only rule was clarity: as long as people could understand it, that’s all I cared about.

This is authenticity through intellectual risk.

Closing Notes

Q: What advice would you give prospective students?

Surprise them. Entertain them. Teach them something you’ve learned. That’s how you write a great essay. And don’t be afraid to go over the top—embrace the weird within you. They read thousands of applications, and your voice is the only thing that can’t be replicated.

When asked what he’d tell his younger self—or any student unsure of their fit—Xander had this to say:

Human beings can’t plan nearly as well as the universe can. Don’t get tunnel vision on one future that has to come true. The best parts of my life—Survivor, Scholarly, UChicago—were all pleasant surprises from serendipity herself.

Beyond Admission

Xander’s journey didn’t stop with UChicago. It became the launchpad for a new kind of legacy. After graduation, he founded Scholarly, a platform that connects applicants with real students and grads from top schools for mentorship, essay feedback, and personalized insight. Why?

Because I don’t think anyone should have to stumble in the dark alone. Everyone deserves to see behind the curtain—to feel like they belong before they even apply.

Scholarly is part storytelling, part strategy, and all heart—just like Xander’s application.

Be bold, be Scholarly